Text 4504, 616 rader
Skriven 2007-05-03 23:30:56 av Whitehouse Press (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Press Release (0705035) for Thu, 2007 May 3
===================================================

===========================================================================
Press Briefing by Tony Snow
===========================================================================

For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary May 3, 2007

Press Briefing by Tony Snow White House Conference Center Briefing Room

˙ /news/releases/2007/05/20070503-5.wm.v.html ˙˙Press Briefings
˙˙Audio


12:32 P.M. EDT

MR. SNOW: Questions.

Q Any results of the meeting today between Mr. Bolten and Senator Reid?

MR. SNOW: Not that we're going to announce. It was a good meeting. So Josh
met with Harry Reid and Senator McConnell, and they will continue to meet.

Q So no movement at this point.

MR. SNOW: I'm not going to characterize. Both sides had an opportunity to
express their views, and exchange views, and all that sort of thing, but I
don't think -- what we've all agreed to do is to conduct these in a way
that is going to allow those involved to go ahead and do their business and
not to try to litigate through the press, but allow them to go ahead and
move toward a bill that is going to meet the requirements the President
laid out, and at the same time is going to give the forces what they need.

Q Does "good" mean that it's leaning your way at the meeting?

MR. SNOW: The "good" means I'm not going to characterize, period.

Q Is there another meeting today, or is the next one tomorrow?

MR. SNOW: I don't know what the schedule is, in terms -- again, we're sort
of meeting at -- we're responding to members of the House and when they
want to talk, we're making our people available.

Q Are there other meetings, like Portman and Hadley, off in separate
sessions with other people?

MR. SNOW: Not that I'm aware of today. Now, again, as I said, there are
going to be times -- and certainly there are going to be phone
conversations. I know Rob has been in contact with some people. There will
be some meetings where we have one, two, or all three of the negotiators on
Capitol Hill, but there are certainly going to be opportunities to talk by
phone, and so on.

Q At any point will the President be brought into these?

MR. SNOW: No, that's certainly not the way it's laid out at this juncture.
I think the President has confidence both in the

negotiating team from the White House and also the people we're dealing
with in the House and Senate.

Q If it takes until Memorial Day, the end of the month, what's the impact
on the military? You've been making the case every day that time is running
out.

MR. SNOW: Well, we've made the case that it is certainly not constructive
to drag this out, but I'm not going to try to play -- we're not going to
answer subjunctive questions.

Q How about the question, will the military --

Q Subjunctive?

MR. SNOW: You know subjunctive, subjunctive mood, Les. (Laughter.)

Q Will the military have difficulty if they don't get the --

MR. SNOW: Again, that is a question properly aimed at the Pentagon. But
also, as you know, the Pentagon is loathe to get into making
characterizations on operational matters. Let's just put it this way: We
know that already there's a requirement of transferring money from certain
accounts to others to make sure that we have full funding. That will
continue to be the case until the emergency supplemental has been passed.
We think it is preferable to have all accounts funded fully.

Q The President has sometimes been critical of Congress when it takes a
recess when there's important pending business. Does he have a view about
the Iraqi parliament planning to take a recess?

MR. SNOW: Well, this is something that I think is probably still under
discussion in Iraq, as well. We're not commenting.

Q Do you, today, have a definition of what an acceptable level of violence
would be in Iraq?

MR. SNOW: You know, I think what you've managed to do is to try to get your
-- we're now playing the adjective game. The fact is, when you talk about
an acceptable level, it is something that allows the government to exist
independently. If you want to -- the problem is, everybody says, oh, so you
accept violence. You like -- violence is okay. No, it's not okay.

So in abstract terms, zero violence is acceptable. On the other hand, we
know well, and the President has said many times, that it is going to be a
tactic of people who want to bring this government down to commit acts of
violence, and violence unfortunately, at least for a while, is going to be
a fact of Iraqi life.

What we're really talking about is trying to create conditions of security
so that you can have a functional democracy in Iraq where people can go
about their daily lives, where they have confidence in the rule of law and
the people who are responsible for protecting them; that you have a
legislative system that is protecting rights and at the same time getting
on with the business -- economic reconstruction, and so on.

So that's really what we're talking about. What you're trying to do is to
address the kinds of violence that are designed to destroy Iraq -- for
instance, al Qaeda recent attacks that are designed not only to create a
lot of bloodshed and to weaken the government, but also to reignite
sectarian violence. That has always been the al Qaeda MO. That is something
that you're going to have to address.

If there is -- and so those are the issues, those that jeopardize the very
existence of the government, those are the things that we want to address.

Q So he wants to minimize violence to a nuisance?

MR. SNOW: What you want to do is to be able to have the government in a
position where it can stand by itself. And I think trying to get into
definitional matters at this point --

Q In October of 2004, John Kerry said, "We have to get back to the place
where we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they're
a nuisance." The President said he couldn't disagree more; Cheney called
this naive and dangerous, and part of a pre-9/11 mind-set. So does the
President now have a pre-9/11 mind-set?

MR. SNOW: No, the President does not have a pre-9/11 mind-set. And the fact
is -- I'll have to go back and take a look, but my recollection is that
there was an attempt to kind of minimize some of the security challenges.
But I don't want to put words in Senator Kerry's mouth without looking back
at the 2004 debate.

It is important to realize that you're going to have to use military force
and, especially in conjunction with the Iraqis, to address violence that
comes from a whole series of factors -- whether they be old members of the
Baath Party, whether they be Iraqi rejectionists, or whether they be
foreign fighters coming in and trying to destroy the government.

Q Tony, why aren't you commenting about the possibility that the Iraqi
parliament is going to take two months off this summer with key legislation
pending? I mean, even if they are considering this, isn't that an affront
to this administration?

MR. SNOW: Why don't you let the Iraqi parliament go ahead and work through
and have debates, even though -- let's just let them go ahead and consider
the matter. And in two months, if this is a really pressing matter, we can
discuss it then.

Q If I could follow here, I mean, it's really kicking up a lot of dust on
Capitol Hill. As you're trying to get this supplemental worked out in
negotiations, doesn't this hurt the whole process?

MR. SNOW: Again, let's see what happens.

Q Are you hearing something different than what we're hearing, that they're
at least considering it?

MR. SNOW: Well, I'm aware of the news reports, but I also am aware that
you've got an Iraqi government right now, where we are working with them on
a whole host of issues -- there was some discussion this morning about the
fact that you have now -- the Council of Ministers have passed on to the
Council of Representatives an oil law. And there is a lot of activity going
on in the country, and I just think at this particular juncture, trying to
draw broad conclusions about something that is rumored possibly to happen
in two months is a great parlor exercise, but it is not a particularly
useful diplomatic exercise.

Q But if somebody is talking about it on the ground --

MR. SNOW: Everybody talking about it -- surely you all will talk about
this. No. (Laughter.)

Q Doesn't it speak to political will? At a time when people are
questioning, can the Iraqi government actually meet political benchmarks,
doesn't that, though, speak to the will of the Iraqi government? Does it
have the political will to move --

MR. SNOW: I'm telling you, let's just wait and see what happens over the
next couple of months. We have had many debates like this in this country.
You may recall when people have gone on vacations before elections, when
they haven't passed budgets, when things have been pushed off until the
very end of the year. I don't want to be doing equations here, but the fact
is the legislative process is something that you have to contend with. This
is a democracy.

On the other hand, what have the Iraqis done? They have committed much of
their budget surplus this year directly to economic development and to
security matters. They have stepped up on the things that we have asked
them to do. They're putting their lives on the line. They are working on
professionalizing the police forces. They are working on building greater
credibility and capability with the military. They're working on economic
infrastructure matters. We've got a meeting in Sharm el Sheikh where there
is a neighbors' conference. There is going to be another conference in
Baghdad.

This is a government that's operational on a whole series of fronts, and
again, rather than trying to leap to conclusions and to ignore the vast
amount of stuff that that government is doing and the risks that they are
undertaking in order to build a secure democracy, what I'd suggest is, wait
and see what happens.

Q Tony, any surprises coming out of Egypt, with Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice and Iranian officials? They walked by one another, and
cordial, said hello, but are you expecting anything --

MR. SNOW: I'll let Secretary Rice -- look, Secretary Rice will be able to
give you readouts of what's happened. We have made the point that there was
a possibility that there may be sidebar, pull-aside conversations. But on
the other hand, you need to set this in the context of the meetings. These
are meetings that are designed to say to everybody in the region, it is now
time to step up and help the Iraqi government; and for those of you who
have been trying to undermine it, you need to stop; those who have been
training militias, you need to stop; those who have been sending forces
across your border, you need to stop; those who have been sending IEDs and
EFPs, you need to stop doing that; those who have been assisting in
financial flows, you need to stop. It is time now, in very concrete ways,
to support this government.

So if there should be conversations, it is likely that the United States
would share those views. But keep in mind any conversations would not be
bilateral discussions, they would not be formal negotiations. They would be
the sort of thing that often happened in meetings of this sort. But again,
I'm giving you a hypothetical. Obviously any reports that may come out of
Sharm, the Secretary of State can read them out for you.

Q Isn't the essence of what you're saying basically going back to what the
Iraq Study Group said, and isn't that basically -- I mean, you're in a
quagmire now, that you have many people saying that the Americans have
walked away from this war and the --

MR. SNOW: Well, actually --

Q Wait a minute -- General Barry McCaffrey has said, Americans have walked
away from the war. And so maybe bring Americans back is to talk to those
who are around --

MR. SNOW: Okay. I think -- first, I think what Barry McCaffrey is talking
about, that he's talking about things like resolutions that would withdraw
support. So if you're talking about Americans, you may want to put into
context what Barry is saying.

Secondly, it has been the case in the past where there have been
conversations with Iranian or Syrian officials at meetings of this sort
with Secretaries of State. Now, the real key is that we do not think at
this juncture that it is appropriate to grant full diplomatic recognition
to Iran, because we have made clear what the conditions are, and so has the
United Nations Security Council, and so have our allies.

So this is certainly not a change in the disposition in terms of full
diplomatic relations, but on the other hand, it is not only not unusual,
but you ought to expect the fact that when you are at a conference and the
topic is how to help Iraq, you will have conversations about how to help
Iraq with all the people who are at that conference.

Mark.

Q The Secretary of State met with the Syrian envoy this morning. How is
that not bilateral? How is it not formal?

MR. SNOW: Because -- I'll let them do the readout, but again, that was a
pull-aside conversation where --

Q What's the distinction?

MR. SNOW: Well, the distinction is, if you have a set aside -- a meeting
that's set aside, and somebody says, okay, we're going to schedule a
meeting, we're going to sit down and do this. But again, I'll let the
Secretary of State describe the mechanics of it.

The other thing is, what did happen is that the Iraqi government has -- did
say, please, can you pass on the message to support. And so that is a
sidebar conversation. But it is a far different thing diplomatically than
setting up meetings and setting up a broad agenda. This is a conversation
about the subject of the conference itself.

And again, Mark, this has happened a lot of times. And in --

Q I know, it's your characterization that I'm still -- how's it -- I mean,
they sat down, they had formal discussion, and there were two of them
there.

MR. SNOW: No, they didn't. I'm not sure that they had formal discussions;
I'm not sure it was just two.

Q Maybe a limited range of subjects, but --

MR. SNOW: No, there was -- limited range of subject, like one.

Q That's still informal and not bilateral.

MR. SNOW: It's a conversation. Yes, it's a conversation. In fact,
conversations happen. It's a good thing.

Yes.

Q Tony, I have two questions. The first is about Gonzales. Does the
President consider the matter of the question of whether the AG should
resign or should not a salient question? And does the --

MR. SNOW: The President supports the Attorney General.

Q Does the fact that -- that a confirmation hearing would be a blood bath
factor into that?

MR. SNOW: No. No. He's -- what you're asking is, does the President support
the Attorney General because it would be messier to fire him? Is that the
question? No. No. He supports the Attorney General.

Q Follow up. The second question would be, the Pentagon has required all
military bloggers to seek approval for their blogging and their -- I think
also their email. Some bloggers in the military and conservative
commentators have said that the government is shutting down --

MR. SNOW: That's -- from what we --

Q -- good news.

MR. SNOW: From what we understand, that is being over-reported a little bit
in the following sense: First, I'm not sure that that is operational, their
request. Number two, to the extent that they have asked, and I would refer
you to the Pentagon for a full comment on this, but my understanding is
that they're concerned about matters of operational security, certainly
people giving their opinions about what's going on as long as they do not
disclose information that is going to jeopardize operations, ongoing or in
the future, or in some way, give away information that will make it easier
for the enemy to kill Americans or Iraqis.

That's normal in a time of war. There is always censorship in a time of
war, mainly to protect the people who are doing the fighting. Similarly
with emails, but there is no wholesale shut down. Again, I'm just giving
you what I know, and I would encourage you to talk to the Pentagon for
further detail. But my understanding is, there's no wholesale shutting down
of blogs or of email. But on the other hand, there is sensitivity to the
fact that you have to be careful when you're doing these things, not to
jeopardize yourself, your colleagues, the operations, the Iraqis, and the
overall mission.

Q When you say over-reported, what do you mean by that?

MR. SNOW: What I'm saying is, the characterization you just gave is some
people say they're being shut down.

Q Tony, the President had an immigration event this morning. Where are your
folks on negotiations with the Hill on a compromise bill on --

MR. SNOW: Again, we're continuing to work, and you've probably noticed I
don't go into a whole lot of detail about what's going on. But there are --
there continue to be talks with Democrats and Republicans and we're
hopefully getting a bill passed this year.

Q Well, I know you said that before. But is there any movement anywhere in
the last few weeks?

MR. SNOW: Again -- well, again, a lot of times -- I would rather just go
ahead and let the conversations proceed rather than trying to characterize
it.

Q Will the President be watching the Republican debate tonight?

MR. SNOW: I don't know. That's a good question. I have no idea.

Q How much of an issue do you think he should be in this debate?

MR. SNOW: I don't -- you know, it's one of those things that -- I have a
feeling that there will be attempts to goad people into talking about it.
On the other hand, each of these people is running for President on his own
merits -- there may even be some "hers" getting in here. Who knows? But I
don't know. You'll just have to -- I'm not going to try to prejudge the
content of the debate.

As a matter of fact, that reminds me, today is World Freedom Day, and I
forgot to mention that we have a statement on that that bears on freedom of
the press. I'll share it later. (Laughter.)

Q We heard the President's views on that yesterday. (Laughter.)

Q Tony, on Syria again, yesterday the Israeli Ambassador in his speech in
Washington before the Israel Project said that Syria has Scud missiles
which can hit any part of Israel. Does the United States concur, and has
the United States brought that topic up with Syria at all?

MR. SNOW: The conversations in Sharm el Sheikh are about Iraq; they're only
about Iraq. Any other conversations -- we still have diplomatic relations
with the Syrians, and there are ways of transmitting messages. But I am not
-- at this point it's not appropriate for me to pass on what may or may not
have been conveyed.

Q The Ambassador also said Israel is being squeezed from the south by arms
that are smuggled in from Egypt through the tunnels into Gaza. Is this a
trip wire? If there is military action this summer, is the U.S. --

MR. SNOW: Again -- just, come on -- you're asking hypothetical questions
with literally explosive consequences, and I think it's best not to go
there.

Q Tony, two questions. One, today is World Press Freedom Day. And U.N.
resolution 1738 protects journalists around the globe, but today many
countries, they don't have respect for the journalists, and also many
journalists are under attack around the globe. And as far as President is
concerned, how he can enforce the law globally, around the country, where
journalists are doing their job --

MR. SNOW: The President does not have the ability unilaterally to enforce
laws around the globe. What he does do is encourage freedom of the press
everywhere, including places where it doesn't exist. And, obviously, we
oppose acts of violence against journalists, against innocent civilians,
against -- we deplore acts of violence against innocents, no matter who
they are or where they may be.

Q And second, if I may. It's kind of personal, but we have been getting
many calls and prayers for you, Tony, how Tony is doing, and all that. What
my question is, what they are saying that you have the courage to come out,
to say about your health, it may help somebody out there who does not know
or they are not aware of. Do you have any message for people --

MR. SNOW: Well, first, don't mistake what I have for courage. Courage is a
guy who signs up and says, I want to go to Iraq and I'll face death. I
didn't sign up for cancer. I got it. But on the other hand, if I can help
people by talking about it, that's great. And it actually has been
something that has been enormously gratifying, because as I've said before,
a lot of times your biggest enemy is fear. And people who want to hide from
a diagnosis are not running -- the best thing to do is to find out what's
going on and then allow people to help you; allow your friends, allow
people around the world -- the one thing I've once again discovered is the
enormous capacity and eagerness of people to help others. There's a lot of
goodness out there, and people are perfectly willing to practice it, but
you've got to give them a chance.

And so, certainly feel free to let people know what your condition is and
I'm certainly very grateful for all the help I've received, but I hope
people will do it for a lot of others, as well.

Peter.

Q The White House is investigating Stuart Bowen. How did this investigation
get going? And can it have credibility, or will it look just like a
political retribution against somebody who was very critical--

MR. SNOW: Well, two things: First, the White House is not investigating
Stuart Bowen. And it's very important to correct that.

Q -- led by Clay Johnson.

MR. SNOW: No, Clay Johnson actually is -- what you have is the President's
Council on Integrity and Efficiency -- this was created by an executive
order in 1992. The theory is to use independent inspectors general to
investigate charges against inspectors general. Obviously, if you're an IG,
you cannot inspect yourself. It's an independent investigative
organization; it does not have ties to the White House.

And so there is an integrity committee that is being chaired at this
juncture by the FBI, and they will take a look at any charges. But there's
a normal process by which people take a look at these things. It is laid
out by executive order. The idea, according to the executive order, is to
address integrity, economy, and effectiveness issues that transcend
individual government agencies; to increase the professionalism and
effectiveness of IG personnel.

And once again, this is sort of a classic way of trying to figure out how
do you do oversight and maintain independence. That's precisely what
they've done. The White House has no role in this, zero. So it's very
important to be -- to draw the distinction there. Clay obviously does chair
the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency.

Q Who does Clay work for?

MR. SNOW: He works for the President, obviously. But on the other hand, you
have inspectors general who operate independently of the agencies, and
they're the ones who are actually conducting it. So, again, I know you want
to try to set up the narrative, but Clay is not, in fact, involved in the
process, nor was he involved in the referral.

Typically what happens in government, and I think you'll agree, Peter, if
somebody has something that people think deserves investigating, you try to
look for an independent way of doing it. And the Integrity Committee within
the PCIE is, in fact, a way that's been there for a long time -- it's been
there since 1992 -- it's an established way to do it precisely so you don't
have conflicts of interest.

Q Tony, did Nancy Pelosi ever give the President a debrief on Syria? And is
Condi Rice's talk with Syrian officials basically a way once again to set
straight, this is what the administration feels, and just lay out the
ground work there? And also, what does Iran need to do to have formal
diplomatic status?

MR. SNOW: We've already laid out -- let's start at the last question --
we've made it very clear, in order to pave the way to diplomatic status --
and the EU3 and the United States have made this offer repeatedly, which is
you have to suspend verifiably your programs that might lead to the
development of nuclear weapons. In exchange, the United States and the
other partners have offered a way forward that includes diplomatic
recognition and involves allowing them to develop a civil nuclear
capability, economic ties, cultural ties, social ties, educational and so
on.

So it's a simple step required by the government of Iran and it is -- we
have made it very public, and we continue to. That position has not
changed.

The one and only topic, again, in Iraq is -- I mean, in Sharm el Sheikh is
to say it is time now to step forward and support the government of Iraq.
That is the strong message that is being sent. And for those who are
undermining, they need to stop and they need to begin to support the
democratically elected government of Iraq. And it really goes no further
than that.

Q Nancy Pelsoi --

Q Try not to --

MR. SNOW: I don't know. I'm not aware that there -- I don't think that
there's any --

Q Is this administration trying to make clear that we only speak for
ourselves, that meaning Condi Rice is saying we only for ourselves, don't
pay attention to anyone else --

MR. SNOW: No, but I think it's understood that in any government the
Department of State speaks for the government when it comes to foreign
affairs, and that the President is the person responsible for foreign
policy. It is certainly common for members of Congress to make travels, but
there, on the other hand, is no mistaking who represents the official views
of the government of that country.

Q Tony, two questions. At tonight's Republican candidates debate, the
pre-debate and post-debate coverage I read will be Chris Matthews and Keith
Olberman of MSNBC, of whom there is a report that last October 23rd, Mr.
Olberman said, "The leading terrorist group in this country is the
Republican Party." And my question: Does the President know why this
Republican debate is tolerating such a reported maligner, and does he
believe they should?

MR. SNOW: I believe that the President will say, Republicans, you can have
whoever moderates your debate that you want to.

Q Okay. The Washington Post reports that House Minority Leader John Boehner
said, "When you break the law in pursuit of a political opponent you've
gone too far." On Tuesday, after the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that
Democrat Congressman Jim McDermott of Washington State is liable for
$60,000 plus $600,000 in Boehner's legal fees over an illegally taped
conference call McDermott leaked to newspaper reporters. And my question:
The President is glad that Congressman Boehner pursued and repeatedly won
this case, isn't he?

MR. SNOW: I'm not sure that the President has expressed an opinion, but I
know in point of fact that Representative Boehner is happy he did so.

Q And so is the President -- isn't the President happy? He's not unhappy?

MR. SNOW: I don't know. Les, it may surprise you, but a lot of times these
sort of saucy little things are kind of beneath the daily attention of a
President of the United States who has got a lot of important stuff --

Q Saucy little things -- that's $600,000. That's not saucy or little, is
it?

MR. SNOW: Oooh. (Laughter.)

Q You want to run away from this. (Laughter.)

Q No doubt, flailing my hands. Try this one more time. Ambassador Crocker
has said publicly he's raised concerns about the Iraqi parliament taking a
recess for two months. Why wouldn't the President raise such concerns with
Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki in his frequent video teleconferences?

MR. SNOW: Well, again, I'm not going to disclose to you -- we give you
readouts of the teleconferences. What I've said is, the Ambassador has made
his view known -- views known, and there is a debate going on in Iraq. So
let's see how the Iraqis handle this. That's all I'm saying.

Q Why won't the White House weight in?

MR. SNOW: Because you know what? Iraq -- we respect Iraq as a sovereign
government, and we are not going to sit around and lecture them on those
particular matters. We will make our views known. And the Iraqis also are
making their views known. Again, there's a vigorous debate about this,
which is why I would suggest that you let these things sort of play out and
see what happens.

Ann.

Q When the President welcomes the Queen, will -- is there time on the
schedule they will actually have any talks? Is there anything substantive
he would like to discuss with her?

MR. SNOW: I'll have to take a look, Ann. I'll find out.

Q Anything --

MR. SNOW: I just -- I just don't know. I've not -- that is my fault. I'll
look much more carefully at the schedule. If you want to get back to me,
I'll answer it.

Q Can you let us all know?

MR. SNOW: Yes, or tomorrow, we can -- I will not be on the podium tomorrow,
but either Tony Fratto or Dana can get back to you tomorrow on it. Is that
okay?

Q Thank you.

END 12:59 P.M. EDT
===========================================================================
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070503-5.html

 * Origin: (1:3634/12)