Tillbaka till svenska Fidonet
English   Information   Debug  
UFO   0/40
UNIX   0/1316
USA_EURLINK   0/102
USR_MODEMS   0/1
VATICAN   0/2740
VIETNAM_VETS   0/14
VIRUS   0/378
VIRUS_INFO   0/201
VISUAL_BASIC   0/473
WHITEHOUSE   0/5187
WIN2000   0/101
WIN32   0/30
WIN95   0/4277
WIN95_OLD1   0/70272
WINDOWS   0/1517
WWB_SYSOP   0/419
WWB_TECH   0/810
ZCC-PUBLIC   0/1
ZEC   4

 
4DOS   0/134
ABORTION   0/7
ALASKA_CHAT   0/506
ALLFIX_FILE   0/1313
ALLFIX_FILE_OLD1   0/7997
ALT_DOS   0/152
AMATEUR_RADIO   0/1039
AMIGASALE   0/14
AMIGA   0/331
AMIGA_INT   0/1
AMIGA_PROG   0/20
AMIGA_SYSOP   0/26
ANIME   0/15
ARGUS   0/924
ASCII_ART   0/340
ASIAN_LINK   0/651
ASTRONOMY   0/417
AUDIO   0/92
AUTOMOBILE_RACING   0/105
BABYLON5   0/17862
BAG   135
BATPOWER   0/361
BBBS.ENGLISH   0/382
BBSLAW   0/109
BBS_ADS   0/5290
BBS_INTERNET   0/507
BIBLE   0/3563
BINKD   0/1119
BINKLEY   0/215
BLUEWAVE   0/2173
CABLE_MODEMS   0/25
CBM   0/46
CDRECORD   0/66
CDROM   0/20
CLASSIC_COMPUTER   0/378
COMICS   0/15
CONSPRCY   0/899
COOKING   28498
COOKING_OLD1   0/24719
COOKING_OLD2   0/40862
COOKING_OLD3   0/37489
COOKING_OLD4   0/35496
COOKING_OLD5   9370
C_ECHO   0/189
C_PLUSPLUS   0/31
DIRTY_DOZEN   0/201
DOORGAMES   0/2014
DOS_INTERNET   0/196
duplikat   6000
ECHOLIST   0/18295
EC_SUPPORT   0/318
ELECTRONICS   0/359
ELEKTRONIK.GER   1534
ENET.LINGUISTIC   0/13
ENET.POLITICS   0/4
ENET.SOFT   0/11701
ENET.SYSOP   33805
ENET.TALKS   0/32
ENGLISH_TUTOR   0/2000
EVOLUTION   0/1335
FDECHO   0/217
FDN_ANNOUNCE   0/7068
FIDONEWS   23541
FIDONEWS_OLD1   0/49742
FIDONEWS_OLD2   0/35949
FIDONEWS_OLD3   0/30874
FIDONEWS_OLD4   0/37224
FIDO_SYSOP   12847
FIDO_UTIL   0/180
FILEFIND   0/209
FILEGATE   0/212
FILM   0/18
FNEWS_PUBLISH   4193
FN_SYSOP   41525
FN_SYSOP_OLD1   71952
FTP_FIDO   0/2
FTSC_PUBLIC   0/13584
FUNNY   0/4886
GENEALOGY.EUR   0/71
GET_INFO   105
GOLDED   0/408
HAM   0/16053
HOLYSMOKE   0/6791
HOT_SITES   0/1
HTMLEDIT   0/71
HUB203   466
HUB_100   264
HUB_400   39
HUMOR   0/29
IC   0/2851
INTERNET   0/424
INTERUSER   0/3
IP_CONNECT   719
JAMNNTPD   0/233
JAMTLAND   0/47
KATTY_KORNER   0/41
LAN   0/16
LINUX-USER   0/19
LINUXHELP   0/1155
LINUX   0/22012
LINUX_BBS   0/957
mail   18.68
mail_fore_ok   249
MENSA   0/341
MODERATOR   0/102
MONTE   0/992
MOSCOW_OKLAHOMA   0/1245
MUFFIN   0/783
MUSIC   0/321
N203_STAT   900
N203_SYSCHAT   313
NET203   321
NET204   69
NET_DEV   0/10
NORD.ADMIN   0/101
NORD.CHAT   0/2572
NORD.FIDONET   189
NORD.HARDWARE   0/28
NORD.KULTUR   0/114
NORD.PROG   0/32
NORD.SOFTWARE   0/88
NORD.TEKNIK   0/58
NORD   0/453
OCCULT_CHAT   0/93
OS2BBS   0/787
OS2DOSBBS   0/580
OS2HW   0/42
OS2INET   0/37
OS2LAN   0/134
OS2PROG   0/36
OS2REXX   0/113
OS2USER-L   207
OS2   0/4785
OSDEBATE   0/18996
PASCAL   0/490
PERL   0/457
PHP   0/45
POINTS   0/405
POLITICS   0/29554
POL_INC   0/14731
PSION   103
R20_ADMIN   1117
R20_AMATORRADIO   0/2
R20_BEST_OF_FIDONET   13
R20_CHAT   0/893
R20_DEPP   0/3
R20_DEV   399
R20_ECHO2   1379
R20_ECHOPRES   0/35
R20_ESTAT   0/719
R20_FIDONETPROG...
...RAM.MYPOINT
  0/2
R20_FIDONETPROGRAM   0/22
R20_FIDONET   0/248
R20_FILEFIND   0/24
R20_FILEFOUND   0/22
R20_HIFI   0/3
R20_INFO2   2789
R20_INTERNET   0/12940
R20_INTRESSE   0/60
R20_INTR_KOM   0/99
R20_KANDIDAT.CHAT   42
R20_KANDIDAT   28
R20_KOM_DEV   112
R20_KONTROLL   0/13063
R20_KORSET   0/18
R20_LOKALTRAFIK   0/24
R20_MODERATOR   0/1852
R20_NC   76
R20_NET200   245
R20_NETWORK.OTH...
...ERNETS
  0/13
R20_OPERATIVSYS...
...TEM.LINUX
  0/44
R20_PROGRAMVAROR   0/1
R20_REC2NEC   534
R20_SFOSM   0/340
R20_SF   0/108
R20_SPRAK.ENGLISH   0/1
R20_SQUISH   107
R20_TEST   2
R20_WORST_OF_FIDONET   12
RAR   0/9
RA_MULTI   106
RA_UTIL   0/162
REGCON.EUR   0/2055
REGCON   0/13
SCIENCE   0/1206
SF   0/239
SHAREWARE_SUPPORT   0/5146
SHAREWRE   0/14
SIMPSONS   0/169
STATS_OLD1   0/2539.065
STATS_OLD2   0/2530
STATS_OLD3   0/2395.095
STATS_OLD4   0/1692.25
SURVIVOR   0/495
SYSOPS_CORNER   0/3
SYSOP   0/84
TAGLINES   0/112
TEAMOS2   0/4530
TECH   0/2617
TEST.444   0/105
TRAPDOOR   0/19
TREK   0/755
TUB   0/290
Möte WHITEHOUSE, 5187 texter
 lista första sista föregående nästa
Text 4754, 178 rader
Skriven 2007-06-07 23:30:56 av Whitehouse Press (1:3634/12.0)
Ärende: Press Release (0706074) for Thu, 2007 Jun 7
===================================================

===========================================================================
Press Gaggle by National Security Advisor Steve Hadley to the Travel Pool
===========================================================================

For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary June 7, 2007

Press Gaggle by National Security Advisor Steve Hadley to the Travel Pool
Kempinski Grand Hotel Heiligendamm, Germany

˙˙Press Briefings

˙˙˙˙˙ G8 Summit 2007

4:27 P.M. (Local)

MR. HADLEY: Can I frame a little bit what just happened -- would that be
helpful?

Q Please do.

MR. HADLEY: We've obviously been concerned about ballistic missile threats
from countries or rogue states armed with ballistic missiles, eventually
weapons of mass destruction, like Iran. We have been working on a U.S.
system to do that. We've obviously wanted to extend protection against this
threat to our close allies, to our NATO allies. That's what the proposal
that the President had made does with the radar systems in the Czech
Republic and missiles in Poland. But the President has also been very clear
-- missile interceptors in Poland.

The President has also been very clear that we understood there were
Russian concerns. We have had a number of instances of a dialogue with
Russia on those concerns. The President sent Secretary Gates to Russia, to
Moscow, to meet with Putin; Secretary Rice, as well. And he has said very
clearly we ought to consider, and Russia ought to consider cooperating with
us in meeting these threats.

And what happened today was, I think you heard from the Russian President
and he said to the American President, we recognize there is a potential
threat, it is a potential threat to Russia, Europe and the United States,
we need to have a dialogue about the nature of that threat. And he made a
specific proposal of how Russia might make a contribution to dealing with
that threat, in terms of making available, as he said, in real time to the
United States and potentially, presumably, to Europe, radar data from a
radar that they have in Azerbaijan, built during Soviet times, still
operating in Azerbaijan, under an agreement between the Azaris and the
Russian government, and making that information available in real time as a
contribution to a system that would provide protection against that threat.

He talks about concerns about Iranian missiles. He believes that once
Iranian missiles are able to threaten Russia or Europe or the United States
were to appear, there would be time to deploy interceptors which could fall
in on the kind of radar architecture he's talking about. It's a bold
proposal. I think the way you have to -- it is an interesting proposal, and
I think the way you have to read it is a willingness by a Russian President
to consider real cooperation and mutual participation on ballistic missile
defense -- something that we have been after for the Russians for almost 15
years, and something the President has been calling for.

So, follow up, we had talked going into this meeting and the President had
suggested that perhaps there might be some kind of working group between
the ministers of foreign affairs and the ministers of defense -- sort of,
those four parties taking a look at ideas both in terms of what is the
potential threat and alternatives for responding to that threat. This was
an idea the President came to. President Putin obviously went further to
that and actually made a specific proposal of contribution and cooperation
in this area.

So where we are is we have the U.S. proposal that we've talked about with
NATO, talked about with the Czechs and the Poles. We have now a Russian
proposal. And what the President suggested to President Putin, and he
agreed, is let's get our experts together, let's put everything on the
table, let's recognize this is a common threat -- as President Putin said,
to Russia, Europe and the United States -- everyone has an interest, let's
look at these proposals in a very transparent way and see if we can come to
a common approach of how to deal with this problem -- both assessment of
the threat, current threat, future threat and how to respond to it. And
that's what President Putin then agreed to.

Q Would the Azerbaijan thing be instead of Poland or --

MR. HADLEY: We're all going to have to see. We're going to all have to see.

Q But you --

MR. HADLEY: I think that the -- President Putin's language he used out here
with you was this would make it unnecessary. And what the President said
is, interesting proposal; we have to have our experts look at it; we have
some ideas and proposals; we think they make sense. President Putin has
proposals; he thinks they make sense. The President's words were: Let's put
everything on the table, have a dialogue and look at experts; have the
experts take a look at it. And that's what we'll do. And, obviously, we'll
do that in close consultation with our European allies, and particularly
with the Poles and the Czechs, who we've identified as having an important
role in this.

Q You're not rejecting out of hand a substitute of that nature?

MR. HADLEY: We are taking this response for what it is. We've asked the
Russians to consider cooperating with us on ballistic missile defense, and
I think what we got was a willingness to do so. And the President's
approach is, we ought to take that. We've gotten yes to that proposition.
We need to put their proposal and our proposal on the table, get experts
together and take a look at it.

Q There's also a new threat in what Putin was talking about, what Putin put
on the table. He said, not only would it not -- he said to us, not only
would the U.S. proposal not be necessary, but it would also not be
necessary for Russia to place offensive capabilities on the border with
Europe. Did you take that to be a new development?

MR. HADLEY: No, I took it as walking back from a threat that you know has
been made by his military some weeks ago and was suggested -- that Putin
suggested in his interviews at the end of last week. And I think what you
heard was him stepping away from it and saying if we can have a cooperative
solution to this problem that takes into account Russia, European and U.S.
needs, then the kinds of targeting comments that were made would not be
necessary.

Q -- the targeting?

MR. HADLEY: Yes.

Q It's not anything different?

MR. HADLEY: No. I think it was stepping away from what had been reported.

Q And in the private meetings, were there any new -- any new developments
that could be interpreted as a threat or a consequence, negative
consequence if the United States didn't --

MR. HADLEY: No. It was -- the tone of it was very different. It was, we
recognize it's a threat, we understand that you don't present -- that you
don't view what you're doing as a threat; my experts view it in a different
way. We've asked our experts to take a look at this problem, and we've come
up with a different way of dealing with it, which he wanted to present to
the President, and he did present to the President. And it is in the
context of U.S.-Russia and potentially European cooperation. That's a good
thing. But, obviously, we have an approach, they have an approach. And as
the President said, we need to get experts together, put it all on the
table in a transparent way, recognize a lot of people have interests in
this dialogue, and see where this leads. That's where we are.

Q Is there a possibility of there both being an Azerbaijan component and a
component in Poland and Czech Republic?

MR. HADLEY: Sure. That's certainly one of the things we will look at it,
and do it in a context where, again, there's mutual reassurance and
transparency in this situation so that people can be reassured that the
system is what's intended to do, to deal with the kind of rogue states out
of a country like Iran. That's what it's all about.

Thanks very much.

Q But he said -- he mentioned no unilateral action. What did you take that
to mean? Not the U.S. going forward with the Czech Republic and Poland
while you guys were talking with Russia?

MR. HADLEY: I think there's a lot of concern in Russia that actually this
system is ready to deploy. And as you know, and as the President said to
President Putin, we are years away from being able to deploy this system.
So it simply was a comment that while we have an opportunity to discuss, he
hopes there isn't going to be a fait accompli. But it's a concern in a way
that I don't think he needs to worry about, because while we want to move
forward with this proposal, as we've discussed, it's going to take some
time, obviously, before we're into deployment. So there is an opportunity
and time for the kind of conversation the two leaders have called for
today.

Thank you.

END 4:35 P.M. (Local)

===========================================================================
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/06/20070607-4.html

 * Origin: (1:3634/12)