Text 34563, 73 rader
Skriven 2006-07-25 20:50:26 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
  Kommentar till text 34540 av SHANNON TALLEY (1:275/311)
Ärende: Israel
==============
>> ST> It's obvious you don't understand the whole picture either.  Let's get
>> one
>> ST> thing straight; there are not "5,000" casualties. Jeez man.
>> Who did mention anything about 5 000 casualities? Certainly not me.

 ST> Yes -- You did.  Go back and look at your original post (also quoted in
 ST> your reply to me).  You stated 5,000 casualties.  Perhaps you made a
 ST> mathematical mistake, but you wrote it and I responded in kind.

It is below and you just have to start reading more carefully. If you do it
once
again you will fing that I wrote *some* of the 5 000 innocent civilian
Americans.

>> Then enlighten me about the casulties being reported. How many civilians are
>> dead and how many terrorists?

 ST> We don't precisely know because those who are reporting the numbers are
 ST> mathematically challenged.  But, according to the Lebanese government,
 ST> they aren't differentiating between civilian and terrorist casualties.
 ST> Syria has officially stated the numbers are inflated also.

So your opinion is hypothetical, I see. Wasn't it you who said that you
don't like to discuss hypothetical issues?

>> ST> Lets get a third thing straight, a
>> ST> civilian that supports Hezbollah is Hezbollah (there is no distinction).

>> So a "normal" Lebaneese doesn't exist, a person like you (perhaps) and me
>> that only live and work and try to make it worth living? Just because they
>> are born and live in Lebanon doesn't mean they support Hezbollah but
>> according to you they are automatically terrorists. Isn't that
>> to see in black or white? Talk about being biased.....

 ST> That's not what I said.  I stated (and it's quoted above just so you can
 ST> read it), a civilian that supports Hezbollah is Hezbollah. For instance,
 ST> if a civilian is holding a rifle and / or shooting rockets at Israeli
 ST> civilians, then that person is Hezbollah.  Don't twist my words into a
 ST> different meaning, just read them.  Your bias is quite apparent to
 ST> everyone, no need to deceive to prove a point, you'll continually end up
 ST> with egg on your face.

What do you know about whom is supporting whom? Hypothetical AGAIN?
Does those who support Hezbollah have a tattoo or something in their face
instead of eggs?

>>>> So then, let me ask you, what you would say if if the Israels would bomb
>>>> and
>>>> kill some of the 5 000 innocent civilian Americans that are in Lebanon?

 ST> See where you wrote 5,000?

Notice the word *some* of the 5 000 American that are in Lebanon. Was that
to difficult to understand?

>> Isn't that what we all are doing here? Speculate and come up with
>> hypothetics or do you know something that the rest of us don't know?

 ST> No.  The Israelis are not hypothetically at war with the Hezbollah.  If
 ST> you believe that, then you have some serious mental issues.

Oh, I'm sure there is a war going on there, at least from pic:s shown here
over demolished houses and dead children.

>> And BTW. You didn't answer my question but I didn't expect it either....

 ST> Again -- with the hypothetical questions -- I won't answer a horribly
 ST> worded lop sided hypothetical question.

Above you didn't mind being hypothetical so why start now?

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)