Text 4251, 143 rader
Skriven 2007-07-12 08:49:02 av Björn Forsström (2:203/614.61)
   Kommentar till text 4213 av Roy Witt (1:123/789.0)
Ärende: CIA's Family Jewels
===========================
 RW>>> Indonesia used to be a nice place, but it isn't anymore (according to a
 RW>>> friend of mine who grew up there)

 BF>> Oh, so now you come up with hearsay.

 RW> If someone is raised in a country like Indonesia when all that existed was
 RW> natives and WW2 relics, then it becomes industrialized, it can't be the
 RW> same country. I believe him.

I'm raised in this country and have in some way been working for SAAB for
about 30 years and you don't believe me about the situation when GM took
over.

 RW>>> The Republic of China is the mainland and it's not very nice.

 BF>> Oh, no hearsay so you have been in China.

 RW> Have you ever read a newspaper or watched a news program? China is in the
 RW> news all of the time. Not a nice place to live, unless you like to be
 RW> controlled in everything you think, say or do.

What's the difference betwwen that and Patriot Act? The princip is the same,
isn't it?

 BF>> My piont is that you talk abot things you haven't a clue about and your
 BF>> open mind isn't as open as you claimed above.

 RW> That's the way it is, people with open minds see things that other people
 RW> don't see. How many times have you been to China, again?

None, and you? But if I want to make China look bad I can do that and if I want
to make China look good I can do that too. An open mind can also see that
everything isn't as bad as you want to make it.

 BF>> Wasn't it you who didn't get to vote the POTUS?

 RW> Oh no, I voted my choice several times in every POTUS election. First
 RW> there is the 'state primary' election, where you vote for one of many
 RW> candidates. This is only a primary election where several candidates run
 RW> for the chance to be on the POTUS election ballot. In 2000, I voted for
 RW> someone other than GWB in the primary election.

So there were one more to the right than GWB.....
We vote one time and at that time we can vote for anyone we like and the one
that gets a majority of the votes win.

 BF>> That was done by others.

 RW> Yes, about 31 million others.

Only 10% voted for GWB, what a marority.

 RW>>> I milked the system once, back in 1970. I drew unemployment for a year
 RW>>> with two extensions and played on the beach or traveled up and down the
 RW>>> coast of California, site-seeing  for the entire time.

 BF>> So back then it was legal to do so but those who does it now are left
 BF>> wing whacos.....please explain.

 RW> I excercised my right to do as the left wing whackos do.

So you are no better than those left wing wachos you blaim, ok.

 RW> What's good for
 RW> the goose has to be good for the gander too. Then again, what I did wasn't
 RW> a permanent thing, just an experiment that was over a year later.

A one year long experiment on others, the tax payers, expense......good.
Something about having a foot in the mouth comes to my mind, wonder why?

 RW>>> We have unemployment also, but many people work that into welfare or
 RW>>> disability payments too.

 BF>> So they can play on the beach and travel up and down the coast of
 BF>> California?

 RW> Or make lots of babys so they can get more welfare.

If I were you I wouldn't toss so much shit on others.

 BF>>>> Leaving no papertrail.....so it can't be checked later.... *I* think
 RW> so.

 RW>>> That happens only in some places, like Iowa or Nebraska.

 BF>> Never the less it did happend in the best democratic country in the
 BF>> world.

 RW> That's right.

It appears that America isn't as perfect as you are doing it.

 BF>> Why didn't he listen to his own, CIA?

 RW> He did. They got their info from those other intelligence agencys.

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't CIA say that they didn't trust this to 100%?

 BF>> Because it didn't suit his agenda  so he had to lie.

 RW> The info he received backed up what he believed.  When someone speaks
 RW> about things as presented to them to be facts, is not lying when one
 RW> speaks of them.

Depends on whom you are listening to.

 RW>>> He's even stated publically that he was mis-informed,

 BF>> What else could he have done?

 RW> I could have done nothing.

You?

 RW>>> but taking out Saddam Hussein was the right thing to do...

 BF>> Why, what had he to do with it?

 RW> See the history behind UN Resolution 1441.

Bull and you know it so if USA doesn't sign the Kyoto protocol those who did
have the right to invade USA?

 RW>>> One can only act upon the knowledge one has.

 BF>> Just as you above where you said that China isn't a nice place?

 RW> Just as you don't believe it is a nice place.

With my open mind I don't know what to believe since I haven't been there and
just believing in Fox News is stupidity.

 RW>>> None the less, you've been saying things that should make you feel
 RW> guilty.

 BF>> And you haven't?

 RW> Nope. My conscience is clear.

You have to have a conscience first.....

---
 * Origin: . (2:203/614.61)