Text 7013, 79 rader
Skriven 2005-01-05 22:55:00 av Darryl Perry (1:106/324)
     Kommentar till en text av Gary Braswell
Ärende: Re: Special Treatment
=============================
On 01-05-05, Gary Braswell said...
 
GB> Darryl Perry -> Gary Braswell wrote:
GB> 
GB> 
GB>  DP>>> Stan initially did not ever require that I show proof for my
GB>  DP> claims.
GB>  DP>>> just threw out the 'you are a liar' claim.  It was me who first
GB>  DP> calle
GB>  DP>>> for substatiation on HIS claim.  If he doesn't want to show any
GB>  DP> proof
GB>  GB>> why
GB>  DP>>> should I?
GB> 
GB>  GB>> Its a rule on the echo, put up or shut up.
GB> 
GB>  GB>> Since you made a claim that GW got special treatment to get into his
GB>  DP> squad
GB>  GB>> you made the initial claim.
GB> 
GB>  GB>> They were asking for proof of that claim.
GB> 
GB>  DP> Stan made no request for proof of a claim.  He just made a personal 
GB> attack.
GB>  DP> How inclinde would you be to be accomdating under those condidions.
GB> 
GB> Being called a liar is not a personal attack in this echo. How inclined wo

Really?  I can go around willy nilly calling people liars whenever they make
some assertion and that wouldn't be considered an attack?

GB> I be? Pretty inclined. I think I have been called pretty much everything i
GB> the book while being on Fido. I have rarely if ever replied in kind. I try

I think responded better than in kind.  He called me a liar.  I called him on
it.  I didn't attack him.

GB> be rational in reply even if those I debate with will not. Shows their 
GB> inability to engage in real debate and discussion.
GB> 
GB>  GB>> While I personally suspect he did get some special treatment, asked
GB>  DP> or not
GB>  GB>> my knowledge there is no proof of it happening. The offspring of
GB>  DP> powerful
GB>  GB>> often get special treatment, even if they or their parents don't ask
GB>  DP> for i
GB> 
GB>  GB>> So if you have some proof, post it.
GB> 
GB>  DP> I did.  See my previous post.  I cite an article that reports that th
GB>  DP> person who actually gave him the preferential treatment admitted doin
GB> so.
GB>  DP> It wasn't some 3rd party person who heard it from another source or o
GB>  DP> tripe like that.
GB> 
GB> You have now, but not at the time. Better late than never.
GB> 
GB>  GB>> As a general rule, people who have been in echo for some time and ha
GB>  GB>> established their reputation for not lying and making up claims.
GB> 
GB>  DP> No, but they can go around making personal attacks I see.  They do al
GB> have
GB>  DP> reputations, that is for certain.
GB> 
GB> If they have the reputation and you were aware of it, why are you incensed
GB> if you object, why are you here?

Their reputation had not become clear until I've seen their postings.  I was
not aware of them until I started participating in this echo.  Like so many
have pointed out, I'm new to this echo.  I had expected to have civil
debates, but that's not what I found in here.  Why am I here?  There are
others in this echo who are not like them, and their postings are much more
worth reading.  But like I mentioned before, the offensive people are not a
problem as I have killfiled them.

 gryphon o aka darryl perry o cyberia bbs o cyberia.darktech.org o mystic/lnx

--- Mystic BBS v1.07.3 (Linux)
 * Origin: Cyberia BBS : cyberia.darktech.org : Kingwood, TX (1:106/324)